American University
Browse
thesesdissertations_2449_OBJ.pdf (2.16 MB)

Assessment of the agonist and antagonist properties of nalorphine

Download (2.16 MB)
thesis
posted on 2023-08-04, 14:44 authored by Scott Thomas Smurthwaite

It has previously been reported that subjects trained to discriminate either the mu antagonist naloxone or mu agonist morphine from its vehicle generalized stimulus control to nalorphine, effects presumably due to nalorphine's intermediate efficacy at the mu opiate receptor subtype. In an attempt to assess the efficacy of nalorphine relative to naloxone (none) and morphine (high), subjects were trained within the taste aversion baseline of drug discrimination learning to respond differentially to naloxone and morphine in a two-drug discrimination procedure. Following the acquisition of the discrimination, nalorphine, as well as the mu agonists methadone and buprenorphine, produced morphine-appropriate responding, while the mu antagonists naltrexone and diprenorphine produced responding appropriate for naloxone. These data suggest that when the relative efficacy of nalorphine is examined, nalorphine lies closer to morphine than naloxone along the continuum of relative efficacy (Experiment 1). Given that in Experiment 1 nalorphine substituted for morphine-trained subjects, but not to naloxone-trained subjects, it was expected that when subjects were trained to discriminate nalorphine from vehicle, nalorphine would generalize this control to morphine but not to naloxone or naltrexone (Experiment 2). Following acquisition of the discrimination, nalorphine stimulus control generalized completely to morphine in five of six subjects, while with the exception of a single subject, naltrexone and naloxone failed to do so. The broad-based opiate antagonist diprenorphine also engendered nalorphine-appropriate responding in all subjects. That nalorphine generalized to morphine but not to naloxone or naltrexone, is consistent with the expectation that nalorphine is a partial agonist at the mu receptor with efficacy closer to morphine than to naloxone. That diprenorphine substituted for nalorphine suggests that diprenorphine, like nalorphine, possesses partial agonist activity. From the present studies, it is suggested that opiates lie on a continuum of efficacy ranging from no efficacy to maximum efficacy and that they can be rank ordered in terms of their relative intrinsic effects: $\rm naloxone\le naltrexone

History

Publisher

ProQuest

Language

English

Notes

Ph.D. American University 1994.

Handle

http://hdl.handle.net/1961/thesesdissertations:2449

Media type

application/pdf

Access statement

Unprocessed

Usage metrics

    Theses and Dissertations

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC