American University
Browse

2008-20 The moral imperative and social rationality of government-guaranteed employment and reskilling

Download (205.43 kB)
report
posted on 2023-08-04, 07:42 authored by Jon WismanJon Wisman

Unemployment exacts a high cost to its victims, not only in lost income, but also in terms of quality of life (insecurity, depression, abandoned families, divorce, suicide, poorer health). It also exacts a high cost to society in terms of lost output, foregone tax revenue, depreciating human capital, and increased costs of welfare, crime, and health care. Yet modern wealthy societies have, principally for the sake of price stability and to avoid the budget costs of a full remedy, chosen to tolerate a substantial level of permanent unemployment. This article explores the moral conditions of this social choice and its rationality in terms of social welfare. It makes and develops support for two claims: society’s tolerance of involuntary unemployment is morally wrong, and it is socially and economically irrational. It concludes that government should guarantee employment by serving as employer of last resort and where appropriate provide for retraining.

History

Publisher

American University (Washington, D.C.)

Language

English

Notes

Working paper No. 2008-20. 47 pages.

Handle

http://hdl.handle.net/1961/5045

Usage metrics

    Economics

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC