American University
Class action certified in Google antitrust lawsuit.pdf (64.98 kB)

Class action certified in Google antitrust lawsuit

Download (64.98 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-07-28, 19:06 authored by Viyon Houessou-Adin

On November 28, 2022, a California federal judge certified a class action of more than twenty-one million consumer plaintiffs in an antitrust suit against the Google Play Store. District Judge James Donato of the District Court for the Northern District of California granted the consumer plaintiffs’ motion for class certification after determining they satisfied the requirements under Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.[1]

This case traces back to August 2020, when Epic Games Inc. filed suit against Google, alleging that its charging practices for in-app purchases violate antitrust laws. Following this suit, Mary Carr, a consumer from Illinois, and a coalition of state attorneys general, filed a proposed consumer class action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated.[2] The cases were consolidated into a multidistrict litigation for centralized proceedings before Judge Donato.[3]

Through their consolidated second amended class action complaint, the consumer plaintiffs alleged, “Google has willfully and unlawfully maintained its monopoly in the Android Application Distribution Market through a series of related anticompetitive acts designed to foreclose alternative and competing Android app distribution channels.”[4] In opposition to the class certification, Google argued that the consumer plaintiffs failed to show how they were harmed.[5] Consumer plaintiffs presented to the court an economics expert who estimated how much injury they suffered as a result of Google’s actions and Google filed a motion to exclude this expert testimony. Judge Donato denied the motion finding that, “Google has not demonstrated that unreliability or invalidity warrant exclusion of [consumer plaintiffs’ expert’s] opinions.”[6] With consumer plaintiffs’ class action being certified, the litigation can proceed, and a trial date is currently set for some time in May 2023.



American University (Washington, D.C.); Juris Mentem Law Review


This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Juris Mentem Law Review. This article has been accepted for inclusion in the Juris Mentem Digital Collection. The Digital Collection is edited by Juris Mentem Staff but is not peer-reviewed by university faculty. For more information, visit: Questions can be directed to


Juris Mentem Law Review

Usage metrics

    Juris Mentem Law Review



    Ref. manager