American University
Browse

Alex Jones’ Sandy Hook Defamation Trial

Download (75.72 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-07-28, 19:18 authored by Rachel Zelicof

Background: Who is Alex Jones?

An extreme right wing conspiracy theorist, Alex Jones and his company, “Free Speech Systems,” claimed that the Sandy Hook massacre was a hoax. He said that “‘the victims’ families faked the deaths of their children.’” [1] He argued further that “the government used ‘crisis actors’ and planned the operation.” Families of the victims were outraged by his comments and demanded that a settlement be reached. The Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was one of the most tragic school shootings in American history. On December 14th, 2012 Adam Lanza opened fire on Sandy Hook Elementary School killing 26 victims, 20 of which were children.[2]

Results: What does Jones owe the victims’ families?

The outcome of Jones’ defamation trial, determined that Jones must pay at least $965 million dollars to the families of the victims. Interestingly, Jones’ attorney shows no sign of backing down from his defense; Jones’ attorney Norm Pattis, said that “‘we’re looking forward to an appeal’”[1]

Implications: What does this mean for the families of Sandy Hook?

It is possible that Jones’ actions will require him to pay even more money based on the violation of a Connecticut statute. Jones claims that he will be unable to pay the required damages since he has filed for bankruptcy. In response to this, attorneys said that the Sandy Hook families will go as far as to “‘chase Alex Jones to the ends of the Earth’”[3]

Conclusions: What does this mean for American Democracy?

Jones’ actions surface concerns about American democracy. Jones even regarded the verdict of his trial to be “‘a joke’”[4]. The Sandy Hook Families claim that Jones is hiding his money in bankruptcy. [4] As an American Democracy, it’s necessary to hold Alex Jones accountable.

History

Publisher

American University (Washington, D.C.); Juris Mentem Law Review

Notes

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Juris Mentem Law Review. This article has been accepted for inclusion in the Juris Mentem Digital Collection. The Digital Collection is edited by Juris Mentem Staff but is not peer-reviewed by university faculty. For more information, visit: https://www.american.edu/spa/jlc/juris-mentem.cfm Questions can be directed to jurismentem@american.edu

Journal

Juris Mentem Law Review

Usage metrics

    Juris Mentem Law Review

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC